I didn't like them at all - I don't understand why these perfumes are so highly praised. They are not perfumes - they have a strong smell of hair spray! I just wasted my money on cheap 90s perfumes. They don't smell like anything anymore - they are not perfumes, just cheap scented water. I don't understand all the hype - I never thought that a giant like Revlon would release such a mediocre product, especially when it was endorsed by Cindy Crawford. Maybe the earlier releases were different, but the one I have from Spain is definitely not worth buying without testing it first.
For its price, this fragrance is very worthy - it's floral, green, long-lasting, bright, and has a trail. No one does mass-market fragrances as well as Revlon! Of course, it's important to consider that this fragrance was released in the early 90s, and there have been many similar fragrances since then. However, for those who love floral scents, it's worth a try.
The fragrance captivated me from the first test. It is a rich floral scent with a hint of powder. I liked it, but it is a specific and very rich fragrance that may seem heavy.
The packaging consists of a box without any wrapping. The manufacturer is England, as indicated by the barcode.
My favorite among Revlon perfumes, 20 years ago they had a whole line of hair care products with the same scent - shampoo and conditioner. A very rich jasmine bouquet. I deduct one star for its lack of longevity. But I am thrilled to have encountered this scent again!
I was really looking forward to these fragrances. For me, there was too much carnation, maybe because I'm not a big fan of it. However, that's only at the beginning. Afterwards, the fragrances open up differently, and you can feel the plum and the tenderness of jasmine. It's not a heavy floral bouquet, but I'll give them some time to settle.
The scent of powder and lipstick from some bygone era...
Decent longevity with a subtle trail. It's not bad for a change of pace. Although, I must admit I prefer Gold by Revlon the most.
I did not like the fragrance at all. The retro aspect is true. It reminds me of the perfumes my grandmother used. It bears a strong resemblance to the scent of "Krasnaya Moskva" perfume.
For me, Charlie Red is all about the solo of tuberose. It is rich and creamy, with the other notes delicately enhancing it. The clove, which I'm not particularly fond of, is barely noticeable, lingering somewhere in the background. It's a beautiful floral scent, with a hint of retro in a positive way. It's not overpowering or suffocating, but rather feminine and soft.
We use cookies on our website to provide you with a unique, personalized, shopping experience. Some cookies are essential, some allow us to offer you comfortable and quick shopping, others help us to improve our website. Each time you use our website you are consenting to Makeup using and processing your personal data. Further details about our cookies and tracking, can be found in our information in Privacy policy & cookies .
I didn't like them at all - I don't understand why these perfumes are so highly praised. They are not perfumes - they have a strong smell of hair spray! I just wasted my money on cheap 90s perfumes. They don't smell like anything anymore - they are not perfumes, just cheap scented water. I don't understand all the hype - I never thought that a giant like Revlon would release such a mediocre product, especially when it was endorsed by Cindy Crawford. Maybe the earlier releases were different, but the one I have from Spain is definitely not worth buying without testing it first.
For its price, this fragrance is very worthy - it's floral, green, long-lasting, bright, and has a trail. No one does mass-market fragrances as well as Revlon! Of course, it's important to consider that this fragrance was released in the early 90s, and there have been many similar fragrances since then. However, for those who love floral scents, it's worth a try.
The fragrance captivated me from the first test. It is a rich floral scent with a hint of powder. I liked it, but it is a specific and very rich fragrance that may seem heavy.
The packaging consists of a box without any wrapping. The manufacturer is England, as indicated by the barcode.
My favorite among Revlon perfumes, 20 years ago they had a whole line of hair care products with the same scent - shampoo and conditioner. A very rich jasmine bouquet. I deduct one star for its lack of longevity. But I am thrilled to have encountered this scent again!
I was really looking forward to these fragrances. For me, there was too much carnation, maybe because I'm not a big fan of it. However, that's only at the beginning. Afterwards, the fragrances open up differently, and you can feel the plum and the tenderness of jasmine. It's not a heavy floral bouquet, but I'll give them some time to settle.
The scent of powder and lipstick from some bygone era...
Decent longevity with a subtle trail. It's not bad for a change of pace. Although, I must admit I prefer Gold by Revlon the most.
This product review is subjective and I agree with the previous review.
I did not like the fragrance at all. The retro aspect is true. It reminds me of the perfumes my grandmother used. It bears a strong resemblance to the scent of "Krasnaya Moskva" perfume.
For me, Charlie Red is all about the solo of tuberose. It is rich and creamy, with the other notes delicately enhancing it. The clove, which I'm not particularly fond of, is barely noticeable, lingering somewhere in the background. It's a beautiful floral scent, with a hint of retro in a positive way. It's not overpowering or suffocating, but rather feminine and soft.